![]() While there is no comparable rift among Arab scholars, this does not mean that their interpretations necessarily are uncritical or alike. Among Israeli scholars there exists a fundamental split between those who generally accept Zionist interpretations and revisionists who call themselves “new historians” and are critical of what they see as the founding myths of Israel. Moreover, the controversy is not as simple as this bifurcated presentation would imply. There is a deep chasm between Arab and Israeli interpretations of the past, which is reflected in the impassioned and confrontational nature of much that has been written about the wars that the two sides have fought since the establishment of the Jewish state in 1948. ![]() In fact, the disputants have not always accepted the legitimacy of the other side, and they often dispute the very facts themselves. Historians and observers have offered starkly different narratives and engaged in bitter polemic. The conflict between Jews and Arabs claiming the same land has historically erupted into wars, and has sometimes been an existential struggle.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |